The Matson & Robinswood Pride in Place programme is investing up to £20 million over the next ten years into our neighbourhood. But before that investment plan is finalised, the Board is asking an important question: should the boundary of the programme be widened to include White City?
Why is this even a question?
The current boundary was set using something called an MSOA – a statistical area drawn up by the Office for National Statistics purely for measuring things like deprivation levels. It was never designed to reflect how people who live here actually see their own neighbourhood, and in practice, it shows.
Take a look at the two maps on the attachment below. The current boundary reaches into roads that most local people wouldn’t think of as Matson or Robinswood at all and it also includes Finlay Community School and Jenkinson Close, which sit within White City, while the White City estate itself, around Beaufort Road and Sapperton Road, is left outside the line entirely.
Look closely and compare the two – does the current line really match your sense of where “Matson and Robinswood” begins and ends? The Government has given every Pride in Place area the chance to review and adjust its boundary at this early stage, precisely because these statistical lines so often cut across real communities. We’ve put together a short paper setting out the arguments for and against including White City – covering things like the area’s 20-year shared community partnership, the shared local ward, deprivation data, and the practical impact on funding per household.
Read the full paper here
This is a genuinely open decision, and we want it shaped by the people who live here. Have your say and tell us what you think by clicking on this link.
Deadline midday Friday 21st August.